Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: KQIX Mild Scandal  (Read 2589 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Alistair
Senior Member
*
Online Online

Posts: 4,052



View Profile WWW
« on: December 16, 2005, 07:10:43 AM »

I'm still trying to get my head around all this, so.. I'll try not to say too much. But in case anyone thinks I'm making this up, it was Josh Mandel who led me to this through the Space Quest forum the SubSpace Channel.
http://blsarch.com/~jess/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4489&sid=afef1dacbc3dfeaf3de25351234dc9ef

Read this thread at the Adventure Gamers' forums, and check it out. It's an interesting read. Though I definitely thought something suspect was going on.
http://forums.adventuregamers.com/showthread.php?s=83d586fbe42c5ae3f25218ac45ab28f8&t=12233&page=2

I'm still not sure what to make of it. But if you Google 'KQIX', it kinda makes sense, with all the ludicrous headlines like 'Silver Lining for KQ shows through', etc etc. It's pretty disappointing, and a fairly obvious marketing ploy. Actually, it's more a sad reflection of what the Sierra community can be, ergo, absolutely mindless. Keeping in mind we have no idea of much about the game.

Doesn't mean I'm not supporting the game, but as Josh himself says, it's pretty, uh, creative tactics to use.

EDIT:
http://www.kqix.com/forum/index.php?topic=3219.80

Check this thread out (well, don't read it because it's pretty boring, but scroll down to a certain post from TribeHasSpoken). For the lazy ones, quote is here:
"Hang on, I just realized something. VUG granted POS the license to continue The Silver Lining on November 29, Cesar's birthday. Some present, wouldn't you say?"
Interrresting.

EDIT 2: Another quote:
"What are Phoenix Online Studios' post-"The Silver Lining" plans? Does Phoenix intend to "go pro"? By the way, don't forget to milk the new license for publicity. Mention how the license enabled the Phoenix to rise from the ashes and continue development to any media contact."
That post is just incidental, it's just a fan. Still heavily ironic.

It's worth pointing out that there appears to be a lot of comments and plays on the two marketing themes, as in "Silver Lining", and "Phoenix rising from the ashes". I'm quite sceptical now.

Incidentally, from the SubSpace Channel thread, Akril is also someone whose opinion I have the utmost respect for- she once also had a KQ9 project, and is the best Sierra fan-artist that I've seen (she does CD covers for me sometimes).

Regards,
- Alistair
Logged
Marten
Global Moderator
Senior Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,857



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2005, 06:28:01 PM »

Alistair,

With so little context except your hyperlinks, I was forced to dig through those forum links and didn't come to the real meat of the issue until page 3.  You could have just linked to page 3... there wasn't much worthwhile for discussion in the preceding pages. Smiley

To summarize here:  

----

Josh Mandel had suggested to the project team several years ago that they should take a low profile to avoid being shut down by VU.  

Cesar, the team lead, felt that a shut down was inevitable regardless of low or high profile, and so he intentionally went high-profile, wagering that he had a better chance of surviving a Cease and Desist if he had already generated a large fan base.

---

And now my opinion on this... I can see it from both sides, that is, Cesar has a point - but I believe Josh had the more level-headed approach.  Furthermore, Josh has worked in the industry and is therefore eminently more qualified to know what would and would not invoke a C&D response from VU.  As a project manager, I'd say that "Cesar drove his agenda without considering the knowledgeable opinions of available domain experts."  He must be grooming himself to be a future CEO.

"Say", their PR director, also doesn't seem to be very good at his job.  He fell just short of personally attacking Josh on the forums, and then had the gall to tell everyone that they shouldn't be discussing the matter on the forums.

I still hope that TSL is a good game.  I recognize that Cesar and Say are not the only project participants and that there are a number of other involved parties who are working on it, and as I haven't seen their comments on this issue, I have to maintain a neutral opinion of them.  We do not know if they approve or disapprove of the hell that Cesar put them through.  The strongest thing I can say is that I hope to never work at a company with either Cesar or Say, because they have an attitude of "I know best" which appears to be unsupported by any evidence of real experience.  I am concerned that their "win" in this situation may serve to further inflate their apparently overvalued opinions of themselves.
Logged

MusicallyInspired
Senior Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,085


-Inspired by Mike Oldfield


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2005, 08:44:57 PM »

I hold the same opinion of Cesar. Which is why I'm wary about the changes he's made to the game since Luke Jensen (former KQ9 leader/founder) left the team.
Logged

"Booyah! Look out, LeChuck! Here comes Guybrush Threepwood's glowing sword of hot monkey vengeance!"
-Guybrush Threepwood, Tales of Monkey Island
Alistair
Senior Member
*
Online Online

Posts: 4,052



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2005, 02:25:08 AM »

Quote
With so little context except your hyperlinks, I was forced to dig through those forum links and didn't come to the real meat of the issue until page 3. You could have just linked to page 3... there wasn't much worthwhile for discussion in the preceding pages.

My bad, guys. In my defence, it was like 2 am and I was seriously distressed by reading this stuff.

Quote
As a project manager, I'd say that "Cesar drove his agenda without considering the knowledgeable opinions of available domain experts." He must be grooming himself to be a future CEO.

*I* would say Cesar intentionally worked things out so that Vivendi would shut them down, the outrage would stir a big commotion up and bring all fans out of the woodwork, and then magically "the fans would save the project" (aka Vivendi grants Cesar the license they'd previously arranged, on his birthday) at which all heck would break loose for the project's popularity. Which it has.

I personally can't bear reading 'Vivendi was on my banned list but now I am sending them a thankyou letter! OMG I'm so happy' etc. I think it's just sad to see the Sierra community like this.

Quote
"Say", their PR director, also doesn't seem to be very good at his job. He fell just short of personally attacking Josh on the forums, and then had the gall to tell everyone that they shouldn't be discussing the matter on the forums.

"Say" is actually a she. And a real bi.., uh, hard person to work/deal with.

I also thought her grasp of English left a lot to be desired, but yes, her attitude was pretty unbelievable. Basically attacking Josh for voicing concerns. The culture of the fangame and their community appears to be "Hey, let's just look at the fluffy stuff. We're not interested in much else." Which is fine, it's a game after all, but this is a serious matter. For a supposed PR rep she didn't appear to handle the situation well at all.

Basically she's a glamour pony who's in love with herself. Which is fine day-to-day, but she brings that personality to KQ9's forums and her PR role in the project. I recall being abused by her in one of the save KQ9 threads because I questioned why they were going to be comprehensively shutdown and not try other avenues. (Though i guess if it was planned, maybe this explains why KQIX was so happy to do no tmuch..)

Quote
I still hope that TSL is a good game. I recognize that Cesar and Say are not the only project participants and that there are a number of other involved parties who are working on it, and as I haven't seen their comments on this issue, I have to maintain a neutral opinion of them. We do not know if they approve or disapprove of the hell that Cesar put them through. The strongest thing I can say is that I hope to never work at a company with either Cesar or Say, because they have an attitude of "I know best" which appears to be unsupported by any evidence of real experience. I am concerned that their "win" in this situation may serve to further inflate their apparently overvalued opinions of themselves.

Yes, so do I. I have doubts about its' quality (eg Akril, the other person who once worked on another KQ9, saying "this apple seems to be falling far from the KQ tree".), but it's good for the community and I support it.

I'm pretty sure the majority of people are faultless and also have no idea of what happened. Bet they'd be interested though Smiley

I think the 'I know best' attitude more accurately translates into 'If this decision pays off, I will look best'. And it made it onto MTV, so..

My main dislike of the KQ9 culture (note: not the fangame itself, howver) stems from the fact that as you mention, Marten, many (and this goes beyond Cesar) of the people involved have very high opinions of themselves and have a tendency to talk down to people. I mean, if you're talking about programming and I know squat, that's fine, but just general discussion.. I have noticed that AGDI's members (eg Tom) do not engage in such egotistical one-upmanship.

Quote
I hold the same opinion of Cesar. Which is why I'm wary about the changes he's made to the game since Luke Jensen (former KQ9 leader/founder) left the team.

What's he done since Luke left? I'm out of the loop.


Personally, i get worried about anyone who calls their fangame project a "resume builder" because of the publicity the 'save KQIX' farce got (he said that in one of his many glorifying interviews).

- Alistair
Logged
jbltecnicspro
Senior Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 626


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2005, 04:47:08 AM »

To put my two cents in:

I don't know much about the Kings Quest IX fiasco, nor do I care that much.  But after reading "Say's" post, I just felt like slapping her.  For one, you don't go on a forum criticizing a man for voicing his opinions - from reading what Josh said, he had a very nice argument, and it makes me wonder if this game is indeed a publicity stunt.  

Next, she went as far as to brag about how "her" project is on MTV, and she basically belittled Josh Mandel's skill and accomplishments.  It would be like me telling Tom that even though he has tons of experience in MIDI, he doesn't know squat about writing music... just one huge wrong move to make.  If anything, her post should be removed from the forums, as it has no relevance to the topic whatsoever.  Asides from personally glorifying herself, her post means nothing.  

When high-ranked members like her start posting crap like that, and when they go as far as to down-talk a veteran, this makes me worry.  Obviously, they feel as if their product is golden, but having this kind of attitude is not good for anything.  People tend to relax their efforts using this mindset, and this attitude could possibly ruin a good game... Well, maybe that's too harsh as to say it could ruin the game, but I will say this: in no way can it help!  

Sigh, oh well.  (Some PR lady)
Logged
Wodball
Senior Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 216



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 17, 2005, 07:00:41 AM »

Hmmm...

<disclaimer>Well, first, I think we're all agreed quite clearly that we all would love to see this game released. </disclaimer>

Side Note: I do not know Cesar or Say, either personally or forum-wise. The only person on the KQIX team that I have any real contact is Michael Fortunato. When I met him in NYC talked to him through e-mail, he was a nice guy.

Now then, it sounds like people are describing a conspiracy theory, albeit a rather reasonable one given what was posted. I can see both sides like everyone else, and in truth, I think if Josh's suggestions had been followed at the beginning, KQIX fans could have avoided some weeks of heartache and we'd be playing it in a few days.

Also, I hope (very sincerely) that this outburst by KQIX Team leaders are  not signs of impending/continuing mismanagement.

One thing I was thinking about... is it possible to contact Petter Holmberg and ask for some inside information? Given that he used to be a regular around her a few years back, maybe he might provide us with some more details about any turmoil lately. For that matter, is Petter still on the project? (Given the name citation on the webpage, I'd say yes, but one can't be sure about these things.)

Well, I hope my next post will be in my parent's house in NJ. I've got a plane to catch in about 10 hours. Hooray that finals are over.

--Woody
Logged
jbltecnicspro
Senior Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 626


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 17, 2005, 01:33:38 PM »

Actually, now I'd like to hear some more information about this "scandal."  I don't think that the artists, composers, programmers, etc., had anything to do with this... and if I was working for Cesar, I'd be ready to beat him if he did, in fact, purposefully try to get the game C&D.
What if Vivendi did NOT grant the license?  Then years of work would have been flushed down the toilet...

One thing that I notice on websites like MTV and IGN is that they tell the Kings Quest IX story as if it was a David vs. Goliath...
Logged
Alistair
Senior Member
*
Online Online

Posts: 4,052



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: December 17, 2005, 03:24:47 PM »

Quote
<disclaimer>Well, first, I think we're all agreed quite clearly that we all would love to see this game released. </disclaimer>

Yep. Don't get me wrong, I want to see this game.

I think the culture of arrogance and superiority pervades the whole upper eschelon of the KQIX team. I think lower down it's pretty normal, though.

I saw Petter Holmberg posting recently (last week) on one of those inane 'KQIX Saved' threads, where people write things like, 'OMG! Thanks so much Vivendi!' etc. Admittedly he didn't write that, and it was good to see his face around, but makes me sad he obviously doesn't know what went on.

Finals are over, I know! my fiance finally graduated. Whoopee!!


Sadly i think any further information will be tighter than Fort Knox to obtain. I think they've realised..

I have a suspicion that the Vivendi license was prearranged. Maybe not when he first schemed about this, but certainly before the actual 'shutdown' occured. But maybe not. I just can't imagine the guy actually risking everything.. but perhaps he did.

Quote
One thing that I notice on websites like MTV and IGN is that they tell the Kings Quest IX story as if it was a David vs. Goliath...

This is disgraceful. I can't stand reading the PR stuff these once-reputable sites are spouting. I think MTV's interview was with PR Say, and IGN's with Cesar.. You can see how they arranged the fanfare.

What I find particularly disturbing about the whole affair is that somehow Vivendi was 'evil', and now they're 'saviours'. Don't people use their brains any more? it's like saying your boss is a good man one day, and when he fires you, he's evil. People need to live in the real world.. There's grey between the black and white!

Regards,
- Alistair
Logged
Ari
Administrator
Senior Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,600



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2005, 07:27:08 AM »

I don't see why Vivendi would take part in such a scheme. It makes them look bad anyway you turn it and nobody wants to be the bad guy in such a story. They may not care much if they are viewed that way, but I can't see them gaining anything from such a move.
Logged

I feel like I'm diagonally-parked in a parallel universe
Alistair
Senior Member
*
Online Online

Posts: 4,052



View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2005, 10:28:20 PM »

I agree, Ari, but I guess look at what's happened. People are already changing from anti to pro stances in the blink of an eye. They're getting fan mail from people who were sending protest letters a week ago!

- Alistair
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: