MusicallyInspired
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 1,102
-Inspired by Mike Oldfield
|
 |
« on: March 22, 2010, 03:32:07 AM » |
|
I'd like to request that this thread be stickied. It'd be nice to have some audio examples of different soundtracks from Sierra, LA, and other games that could maybe be hosted here on Quest Studios for people who are wondering what the differences are when trying to decide which model to buy for optimal Sierra/LA/other DOS game soundtrack experiences. I'd post some myself as I have a first-gen MT-32 and a CM-500, but I don't know which tracks would be the best to choose to really showcase the more jarring differences between the models.
Anyone know of any obvious examples?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Booyah! Look out, LeChuck! Here comes Guybrush Threepwood's glowing sword of hot monkey vengeance!" -Guybrush Threepwood, Tales of Monkey Island
|
|
|
endre1952
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 399
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2010, 11:08:12 AM » |
|
There are some games that clip on a CM-32L or CM-500, because you have no external control over the digital volume on those units. Some examples are the fireworks in the intro of Wing Commander, Prehistorik and Wrath of the Demon.
I found a solution: I execute a sysex file that reduces the midi/digital volume before loading a problematic game.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Salient
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 248
There is no final truth
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2010, 03:23:28 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
endre1952
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 399
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2010, 03:37:30 PM » |
|
Guess what, I do hear the difference! I do have a first gen. MT-32 packed away, and intend to keep it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Alistair
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2010, 09:16:40 PM » |
|
I wonder if a first gen MT-32 has any advantages over the CM-32L for games that were composed on a first gen. As in, with the weird vibrato/etc it sounds 'right' on a first gen and not on a second gen or CM device.
- Alistair
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Salient
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 248
There is no final truth
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2010, 05:07:43 AM » |
|
For Dune II, I prefer the first gen MT-32. For the rest (as far as I know/tested) either it doesn't really matter or the CM-32L is better. Try, for example, 4D Sports Boxing on a first gen. MT-32. You will find the track go out of tune at some point whereas on the CM-32L it plays alright.
And of course in some games, like Temptress of the lure, the extra soundeffects are utilized which makes the mt-32 first gen (and also second gen in that matter) quite useless.
The game TFX requires a CM-32L (or LAPC-I) as well to play correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
endre1952
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 399
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2010, 01:12:28 PM » |
|
Some of you here have said that Police Quest 2 only sounds right on a first gen. MT-32. Can I hear an example?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
MusicallyInspired
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 1,102
-Inspired by Mike Oldfield
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2010, 11:03:46 PM » |
|
You mean the CM-32L doesn't have the annoying super-vibrato?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Booyah! Look out, LeChuck! Here comes Guybrush Threepwood's glowing sword of hot monkey vengeance!" -Guybrush Threepwood, Tales of Monkey Island
|
|
|
|
|
MusicallyInspired
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 1,102
-Inspired by Mike Oldfield
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: March 26, 2010, 02:07:15 PM » |
|
The topics about MT/CM differences were made so long ago I couldn't remember the details (and I couldn't find them on the forum) and my day-to-day life doesn't revolve around the technical details of Roland synths. I also didn't realize it had a Wikipedia entry. Honestly, as natural as it seems to most peope to immediately revert to Wikipedia it's never been my first inclination. Plus it's been wrong about many things in the past so I don't fully trust it.
That said I was SURE I remember hearing comparison examples of a KQ5 track on the MT-32, CM-32L, and the CM-500 and I was sure that both CM modules had the vibrato issue. Clearly I'm wrong. But that's why I wanted a thread like this stickied.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 26, 2010, 02:09:13 PM by MusicallyInspired »
|
Logged
|
"Booyah! Look out, LeChuck! Here comes Guybrush Threepwood's glowing sword of hot monkey vengeance!" -Guybrush Threepwood, Tales of Monkey Island
|
|
|
NewRisingSUn
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 650
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: March 26, 2010, 07:24:33 PM » |
|
The MT-32 Wikipedia article in its current form was mostly written by members of this forum precisely for the purpose of summing up what was discussed in the various threads here, so that people whose "life doesn't revolve around the technical details of Roland synths" would find the information without looking for sticky threads in web forums that they don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MusicallyInspired
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 1,102
-Inspired by Mike Oldfield
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: March 27, 2010, 04:43:15 PM » |
|
Granted. But that doesn't change the fact that I didn't know it existed and I DO know these forums exist.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Booyah! Look out, LeChuck! Here comes Guybrush Threepwood's glowing sword of hot monkey vengeance!" -Guybrush Threepwood, Tales of Monkey Island
|
|
|
|